Editorial policy

This page exists so you can judge how much weight to give anything on this site. It says who writes it, how claims are established, who pays for it, and what we will not do for money. Last updated 21 September 2026.

Who writes this site

Editorial responsibility for everything published here rests with Susan Jones, director of publication for BAUSTANDARD s.r.o.. Articles carry a named byline and a publication date, and a separate “last reviewed” date where the two differ. There are no anonymous articles and no pseudonymous authors on this site.

How we establish facts

1. Primary sources first. For a video game, the primary sources are the developer's own published material and the game's own in-game information screens — including, for chance-based mechanics, the developer's published probability disclosure.
2. Systems over numbers. We describe how mechanics work in preference to quoting figures, because mechanics are stable across updates and figures are not. Where a figure matters, we tell you which screen shows the current value instead of reprinting a number that will rot.
3. Hedge or omit. If we cannot verify something, we either say plainly that it is uncertain or we leave it out. We do not estimate a statistic and present it as a fact.
4. Cite. Sources are listed on the article. Where our page and the developer's own information diverge, the developer's information prevails, and we say so on the page.

How the site is funded

By advertising, in one specific form: partner links. If a reader follows a labelled partner link and registers with the advertiser, BAUSTANDARD s.r.o. may receive a commission from that advertiser. Readers pay nothing, and there is no subscription, no paywall and no advertising network on these pages.

What we refuse to do

These are not aspirations. They are rules, and breaking one is grounds for taking a page down.

• No invented testimonials. We do not publish “reader stories”, reader-submitted experiences, quotes or case studies that we did not receive from a real, identifiable person who agreed to publication. We would rather publish none, and currently we publish none.
• No invented ratings. No star ratings, no scores out of ten, no “editor's choice” badges and no league tables, unless we can show the methodology behind the number. We currently publish no ratings at all.
• No artificial urgency. No countdown timers, no “offer ends tonight”, no fake stock counters, no “only 3 places left”, no exit-intent pop-ups and no interstitials designed to stop you leaving.
• No guaranteed-result claims. We do not promise outcomes — not winnings, not rankings, not progress, not income. For a game monetised by chance-based mechanics in particular, any claim of a guaranteed result would be false.
• No hidden advertising. Every link that can earn us money is visibly labelled as a partner link and marked rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" in the HTML. We do not disguise advertising as editorial, and we do not bury the disclosure below the fold.
• No dark patterns in the commercial path. No pre-ticked boxes, no consent walls, no misdirection between a “read more” and a commercial link.
• No tracking of readers. No cookies, no analytics, no advertising pixels, no fingerprinting and no browser storage. See the cookie policy.
• No fabricated specifications. If we have not verified a number, it does not appear.

Independence from advertisers

• No advertiser sees, reviews or approves an article before it is published.
• No advertiser has the right to demand a change, a removal or a favourable framing. Corrections are made on the merits, whoever asks.
• No payment we receive is conditional on the tone of our coverage. A commission is paid on a reader action, not on our writing something positive.
• Commercial arrangements do not determine what subjects we cover, and the editorial part of a page is written before the commercial part is placed on it.
• Where a criticism of an advertised product is true and relevant, it is published. This guide, for example, states plainly that the product's summoning mechanic is chance-based and that readers who dislike chance-based purchases should not start.

Corrections procedure

We will correct anything that is wrong, regardless of who points it out.

1. Write to info@pravadin.online with the page address and what you believe is wrong. A source helps but is not required.
2. We aim to acknowledge within five working days.
3. If the claim is wrong, we correct it and update the “last reviewed” date. For a material correction — one that changes the meaning of the page — we add a dated note saying what was changed, rather than editing silently.
4. If we disagree, we reply and explain why. We do not simply ignore the message.
5. If the complaint concerns your personal data rather than a factual error, see the privacy policy, which sets out your rights and the supervisory authority you may complain to.

Illustrations

All diagrams on this site are original SVG files drawn by us and served from this domain. We do not use product screenshots, stock photography or third-party artwork anywhere, both because it would raise copyright and trademark problems on an advertising-funded page, and because a diagram we drew ourselves can be made to explain the thing we actually want to explain.